<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Circuit-Breaker on dplabs — Software Engineering &amp; Technology Consultancy</title>
		<link>https://dplabs.tech/tags/circuit-breaker/</link>
		<description>Recent content in Circuit-Breaker on dplabs — Software Engineering &amp; Technology Consultancy</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en-us</language>
		
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="https://dplabs.tech/tags/circuit-breaker/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>Building Resilient Spring Boot Services</title>
				<link>https://dplabs.tech/blog/spring-boot-resilience/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://dplabs.tech/blog/spring-boot-resilience/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;Resilience patterns exist to handle the failures that are guaranteed to occur in distributed systems. Downstream services become unavailable. Networks time out. Databases become overloaded. These are not exceptional events — they&amp;rsquo;re normal operating conditions that a production service must handle correctly.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The mistake is adding resilience patterns everywhere as a precaution. A circuit breaker on a service that never fails adds overhead without value. A retry on a non-idempotent operation can cause duplicate side effects. Resilience patterns should be applied deliberately, to specific failure modes that matter for your system.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
