<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Fine-Tuning on dplabs — Software Engineering &amp; Technology Consultancy</title>
		<link>https://dplabs.tech/tags/fine-tuning/</link>
		<description>Recent content in Fine-Tuning on dplabs — Software Engineering &amp; Technology Consultancy</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en-us</language>
		
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="https://dplabs.tech/tags/fine-tuning/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>RAG vs Fine-Tuning: Choosing the Right Tool for LLM Customization</title>
				<link>https://dplabs.tech/blog/rag-vs-fine-tuning/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://dplabs.tech/blog/rag-vs-fine-tuning/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;ldquo;Should we use RAG or fine-tuning?&amp;rdquo; is a question teams ask when they need an LLM to work better for their specific use case. It&amp;rsquo;s often the wrong question — they&amp;rsquo;re different tools that solve different problems and can be combined.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Getting this wrong is expensive. Fine-tuning a model to &amp;ldquo;know&amp;rdquo; information that should be retrieved leads to a model that&amp;rsquo;s expensive to update and confidently answers with stale data. Implementing RAG when the problem is actually about model behavior leads to a system that retrieves correctly but still behaves wrong.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
